When a planning permit requires a dilapidation report, the builder or developer typically appoints and pays for the inspector. However, many property owners wonder whether they should also commission their own independent report. This article explores the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
Builder-Appointed Inspectors
When the builder arranges and pays for the dilapidation report, it satisfies the planning permit condition at no cost to the neighbouring property owner. However, questions of independence and thoroughness may arise when the inspector is paid by the party whose construction may cause damage. We connect you with truly independent inspectors who work solely for property owners.
Benefits of an Independent Report
- Complete independence from the builder or developer
- Inspector works solely in the property owner’s interest
- Potentially more thorough as the owner has direct control over scope
- Provides a second opinion on property condition
- Can include areas not covered by the builder’s report
Cost Considerations
Commissioning an independent report means additional cost. However, compared to potential repair costs if construction damage occurs, this investment is modest. Some property owners view it as essential insurance. Use our cost calculator for pricing.
How This Relates to Your Property
Whether to commission an independent report depends on the scale of nearby construction, the value of your property, and your risk tolerance. For high-value properties or major construction projects, an independent report provides valuable additional protection. Read more in our decision-making guides. Visit our about page for more information.
Get Professional Advice
If you need an independent dilapidation report in Melbourne, get a free quote today. We connect you with qualified building surveyors and structural engineers across metropolitan Melbourne.